Hard cut: Test, T3, Metformin & Ozempic:

Jpmerr2021

Member
Anybody else ever tried the above?

I have used all compounds individually but I am considering using all 4 together and going on a hard cut to get as lean as possible.

Anybody here used all 4 on a cut? How was your experience?
 
Anybody else ever tried the above?

I have used all compounds individually but I am considering using all 4 together and going on a hard cut to get as lean as possible.

Anybody here used all 4 on a cut? How was your experience?
You don’t need all 4.

You need test, and Tirz or I prefer Reta.

150-180 test a week and work your way up to double digit mgs of Reta a week. Watch your body change weekly

Oh and diet and cardio
 
you can just eat nothing and lose all the weight in the world u want.

now what we want is to abuse compounds that let us lose fat without losing as much muscle.

glp/metformin lowers blood sugar so they're ideal for a bulk.

anabolics & hgh is all you need for ideal enhanced fat loss.

if glp help you control your hunger u can do them aswell on cut, it isnt needed at all. i do this aswell.

thyroid hormones dosent do much to preserving muscle unless u are deficient in them.
 
T3 is straight up catabolic I believe. Maybe toss some albuterol or clen mixed with alpha-yohimbine for that stubborn fluff
yes but if you're deficient in t3/t4 eating very little food under 200g of carbs to lose weight your muscles is gonna lack glycogen and you're gonna impair your gains. the more efficient you get your body at using calories = the better gains. and your thyroid hormones directly influence muscle protein synthesis so you're less anabolic if you're deficient in them especially.
 
Alright lad,

I’m running test, HGH, T4, clen, Reta, and metformin.

I do it under brutal calorie deficit, about 240 grams of protein a day, loads of fishoils and barely anything else.
T4 keeps the whole system from shutting down. I’ve never been keen on T3, feels a bit much on its own,T4’s safer for a single compound.
Reta keeps the crash at bay.
Metformin keeps insulin sensitivity in check.

I’d rather suffer hard for a short while than drag it out for months.

All of it works together, lets me get to contest shape in weeks, not a year.
 
I’m running test, HGH, T4, clen, Reta, and metformin.

I do it under brutal calorie deficit, about 240 grams of protein a day, loads of fishoils and barely anything else.
T4 keeps the whole system from shutting down. I’ve never been keen on T3, feels a bit much on its own,T4’s safer for a single compound.
Reta keeps the crash at bay.
Metformin keeps insulin sensitivity in check.

I’d rather suffer hard for a short while than drag it out for months.

All of it works together, lets me get to contest shape in weeks, not a year.
carbs literally inflates and protect your muscle! and fats protect your health! this diet should not be followed by anyone on steriods
 
carbs literally inflates and protect your muscle! and fats protect your health! this diet should not be followed by anyone on steriods
Bit of silly bro-science there. All you need to hold muscle is protein and lifting and your normal AAS doses. Test, HGH, clen, metformin, they all protect muscle, no matter the carbs. You know I’ve been in pro bodybuilding over 25 years right? Carbs are fine if that's the way you want to do it, but they bump your cals and slow things down. You’ll just need to train harder. sure carbs assist you in being able to do that.
 
Last edited:
Bit of silly bro-science there. All you need to hold muscle is protein and lifting and your normal AAS doses. Test, HGH, clen, metformin, they all protect muscle, no matter the carbs. You know I’ve been in pro bodybuilding over 25 years right? Carbs are fine if that's the way you want to do it, but they bump your cals and slow things down. You’ll just need to train harder. sure carbs assist you in being able to do that.
here is the truth on nutrition from ai since i dont wanna teach such basic things as carbs on a steriod forum;

⚠️ 1. “All you need to hold muscle is protein and lifting and your normal AAS doses.”

What's wrong:
  • Oversimplification. While anabolic steroids (AAS) do help preserve lean mass, muscle retention and performance are influenced by a broader set of variables, including carbohydrate intake, sleep, micronutrients, and hormonal balance.
  • Carbohydrates are muscle-sparing during a deficit. They reduce the need for gluconeogenesis (where the body breaks down muscle to make glucose).
  • AAS doesn’t eliminate catabolism entirely, especially under extreme stress (e.g. deep calorie deficit + intense training + no carbs).
What’s partially true:
  • On gear, you can maintain more muscle in a deficit with less reliance on carbs compared to natural lifters — but completely removing carbs isn’t optimal, even for enhanced athletes.

⚠️ 2. “Test, HGH, clen, metformin, they all protect muscle, no matter the carbs.”

What's wrong:
  • Misrepresents mechanisms.
    • Testosterone: Promotes muscle growth, yes — but recovery and glycogen replenishment still benefit from carbs.
    • HGH: Preserves lean mass, but in low-carb states it increases cortisol and lipolysis — not ideal for every goal.
    • Clenbuterol: Is catabolic in some contexts (e.g. in natural lifters), and doesn't directly “protect” muscle — it's more a thermogenic.
    • Metformin: May even impair hypertrophy by blunting mTOR activation — it’s not a muscle-sparing agent.
What’s misleading:
  • These drugs might help preserve muscle in a cut, but they don’t replace the function of carbohydrates, especially for high-performance training.

⚠️ 3. “Carbs are fine if that's the way you want to do it, but they bump your cals and slow things down.”

What's wrong:
  • False cause and effect. Carbs are not inherently fattening — caloric surplus is what causes fat gain.
  • Carbs don’t “slow things down”. In fact, they usually improve performance, training volume, recovery, and even thyroid function.
  • Low-carb diets can sometimes reduce water weight quickly, but that’s not fat loss.
What’s misleading:
  • This paints carbs as optional or detrimental, when in most athletic cases, they are performance-enhancing.

⚠️ 4. “You’ll just need to train harder. sure carbs assist you in being able to do that.”

Contradictory statement.
  • The person is essentially admitting that carbs help you train harder, which is crucial in maintaining or gaining muscle mass.
  • If you need to train harder but remove carbs, you lose the fuel that helps you train harder. That’s a self-defeating loop.

Summary of Key Issues​

ClaimWhat's Wrong
Protein + lifting + AAS are all you needOversimplifies muscle retention; ignores carbs' role in recovery/performance
Test/HGH/clen/metformin protect muscle regardless of carbsMisrepresents drug mechanisms; doesn’t replace proper nutrition
Carbs slow things downWrong; carbs often improve training, recovery, and hormonal health
You just need to train harderContradicts the idea of cutting carbs, which help enable harder training

✅ The Truth (Evidence-Based):​

  • Carbs enhance training performance, pump, glycogen replenishment, and recovery.
  • In enhanced athletes, carbs are still highly useful — even if not essential for basic muscle retention.
  • Ketogenic/carnivore approaches may work for some, but they are not superior for body composition or performance.

 
Bit of silly bro-science there. All you need to hold muscle is protein and lifting and your normal AAS doses. Test, HGH, clen, metformin, they all protect muscle, no matter the carbs. You know I’ve been in pro bodybuilding over 25 years right? Carbs are fine if that's the way you want to do it, but they bump your cals and slow things down. You’ll just need to train harder. sure carbs assist you in being able to do that.
here is some important keypoints i think it missed, theres probably way more:

how much muscle can you build with carbs vs no carbs

ChatGPT sagde:​

The difference in muscle-building potential between a high-carb vs no-carb (e.g. carnivore/keto) diet can be significant, especially over the long term and depending on training intensity, recovery, and enhancement status (natty vs on gear). Let’s break it down based on physiology and real-world outcomes:

Muscle Growth with Carbs vs No Carbs: Overview

FactorHigh-Carb DietNo-Carb Diet (Carnivore/Keto)
Glycogen storageOptimalDepleted
Training performanceHigher volume, intensity, recoveryOften lower energy output
Pump & muscle fullnessImprovedFlat look, reduced pump
mTOR & insulin signalingStrong activationWeaker (especially without carb-induced insulin spikes)
CortisolRegulated better post-trainingOften elevated
Net muscle gain (natural)OptimalSub-optimal (often 20–30% less)
Net muscle gain (on gear)HighStill decent, but not optimal

Realistic Muscle Gain Scenarios​

Assumes proper training, sleep, and protein intake.

1. Natural Lifter, Bulking for 12 Weeks

  • High-Carb Diet: Gain ~4–6 lbs (1.8–2.7 kg) of lean mass
  • No-Carb Diet: Gain ~2.5–4 lbs (1.1–1.8 kg) of lean mass
Difference: ~20–40% less lean mass gain without carbs

2. Enhanced Lifter on Test + HGH + Tren, Bulking 12 Weeks

  • High-Carb Diet: Gain ~8–12 lbs (3.6–5.4 kg) of lean mass
  • No-Carb Diet: Gain ~6–9 lbs (2.7–4.1 kg) of lean mass
Difference: ~15–25% less — still decent growth thanks to drugs, but suboptimal without carbs

Why Carbs Matter for Muscle Growth

  1. Glycogen fuels training intensity.
    • Training harder = more muscle stimulus.
  2. Insulin is anabolic.
    • Carbs elevate insulin, which promotes muscle protein synthesis and inhibits muscle breakdown.
  3. Carbs regulate cortisol.
    • Low-carb diets often lead to elevated cortisol, which can hinder recovery and muscle growth.
  4. mTOR pathway stimulation.
    • While protein (especially leucine) activates mTOR, carbs amplify this by boosting insulin.

Why No-Carb Diets Limit Gains​

  • You may feel flat, under-recovered, and unable to hit high training volumes.
  • Glycogen is a limiting factor in heavy resistance training.
  • You often need higher fat to meet energy demands, which isn’t as efficient for muscle growth as carbs are.

✅ Summary​

  • Carbs help you train harder, recover faster, and grow more.
  • Without carbs, especially for natural lifters, you leave up to 30–40% of potential gains on the table.
  • Enhanced lifters can still grow without carbs — but not as much as they would with a smart carb strategy.

If you're cutting, low carbs might make sense short-term, but for muscle building, carbs are one of the most anabolic legal substances you can use (especially combined with AAS).
Let me know if you want a carb-cycling or low-carb bulk plan that tries to minimize downsides.

Du sagde:​

so just maingaining with carbs i can grow way more muscle than cutting them out? then arent i an idiot for ever doing that

ChatGPT sagde:​

You're not an idiot at all — in fact, the fact you're questioning and learning now puts you way ahead of most.

Short answer:​

Yes — even when maingaining (eating at or just above maintenance), having carbs in your diet will let you grow more muscle than going zero-carb. Especially if you’re:
  • training hard (which you are),
  • enhanced (which you are),
  • and prioritizing muscle growth with minimal fat gain.

Why you're not dumb for trying no-carb:​

  1. It’s a very common experiment.
    • Tons of lifters, even pros, fall into the carnivore/keto trend, especially when cutting — it’s marketed hard and sounds logical at first.
  2. You were probably trying to optimize fat loss.
    • Low-carb often leads to quicker water loss and visible fat loss, which can trick people into thinking it’s optimal.
  3. You likely still gained muscle if you were on gear.
    • AAS protects muscle hard, so your “loss” in gains might only be 10–20% lower — not a complete waste.

✅ What you should take away now:​

  • Carbs are muscle-fuel. Even 100–200g/day depending on your size and intake can dramatically improve training output.
  • You don’t need to “bulk dirty” — a controlled maingain with carbs can grow plenty of muscle without adding fat.
  • If you cycle carbs around training, you can stay lean and get the performance benefit.

Simple plan going forward:​

  • Keep carbs around training (pre/intra/post).
  • Use clean carbs like rice, oats, fruit, potatoes — they digest well and support recovery.
  • Stay at slight surplus or maintenance — let performance guide your intake.

Bottom line:​

You’re not dumb — you experimented, and now you know better. That’s called progress. Lots of pros went low-carb and realized later they sabotaged gains — but you caught it early.
Want help setting up a carb-focused maingain plan with your gear setup?

does protein stall at some point? lets say i eat only 240g protein with minimal carbs and a little fat, wouldn't i need carbs or does protein synthesis and triglycerides max out at some point and i would be better off adding carbs?

ChatGPT sagde:​

Great question — this gets into the limits of protein metabolism, and yes: protein does stall in its ability to build muscle without carbs, and here's why:

Key Truths About Protein, Carbs, and Muscle Growth

✅ 1. Muscle protein synthesis (MPS) is capped per meal and per day

  • Your body only uses a certain amount of amino acids for muscle-building at a time.
  • Around 0.4–0.6g/kg per meal maximizes MPS (so ~30–50g protein for most people).
  • After that, excess amino acids get oxidized for energy — not used for muscle growth.
So yes, 240g of protein alone won't keep building more muscle indefinitely — you're hitting a ceiling unless you support it with other factors (like carbs, insulin, and training volume).

⚠️ 2. Without carbs, more protein gets burned for fuel (gluconeogenesis)

  • Your body converts amino acids to glucose when carbs are low — especially if you're training hard.
  • That means less protein is used for recovery or muscle building.
So even if you're eating 240g, some of that isn’t going to muscle — it’s just fueling your brain and workouts.

⚠️ 3. Triglycerides (from fat) don't replace glycogen in training

  • Fat is a slow fuel. It's not effective for high-intensity anaerobic work like lifting or sprinting.
  • Carbs replenish glycogen and fuel explosive training, which is what stimulates growth.

✅ 4. Carbs amplify the muscle-building signal

  • Carbs spike insulin, which:
    • Reduces muscle protein breakdown
    • Increases nutrient delivery (like amino acids)
    • Activates mTOR synergistically with leucine
  • Without carbs, you’re getting a blunted anabolic response.

So what happens if you only eat 240g protein and low everything else?​

  • Your protein synthesis plateaus
  • Your training performance suffers (less stimulus = less growth)
  • You burn protein for energy instead of building muscle
  • You may feel flat, tired, and not recovering well

✅ You’d Be Better Off Adding Carbs​

Even 100–200g of carbs/day, especially around your workout, would:
  • Spare protein from being burned
  • Increase training volume and intensity
  • Enhance recovery
  • Help shuttle aminos into muscle

TL;DR​

ScenarioResult
240g protein + minimal carbs/fatMPS plateaus, protein wasted for energy, poor recovery
240g protein + moderate carbsMaximal muscle growth, performance, and recovery

Carbs don’t just “help” — they unlock the full potential of your protein and training. Without them, you're leaving growth on the table, even with a high-protein, enhanced setup.
Want me to help you figure out your ideal protein + carb balance for a lean mass phase?
 
Lad, you seems psychotic, and none of your babble is truth.
You are not even adressing things in context.

Who cares about maximizing your training, when you are cutting hard and using AAS. You are not going to gain muscle in those periods no matter what you do anyways. It’s easy maintaining muscle mass on these stacks, it takes 2 training passes a week and plenty of protein and nothing else. You are not going to loose a gram of muscle mass.

If you are training for performance, or in a gaining phase sure carbs are fueling your workout. But for cutting fat, you seem clueless.

Your text look chatgtp generated btw, seems like your feed it to give you the answer you wanted.

I would get of the juice if I was you, we don’t all handle test equally well mentally.
 
Last edited:
Maybe it works better like this without carbs, we are not all egos and maybe for someone else it won't work
Both will work for almost everyone.
It’s more a matter of how smart you will be about it,

My answers is not based on some chatbot but 25+ years of testing and keeping an accurate daily logbook.

Here is what I know:

Adding kcals in will make the deficit smaller,
You can compensate in 3 ways only: use more time losing the fat, use more peds, or train more (use more energy),

Using longer time to lose the fat while suffering less is fine, if you prefer that add in more carbs,

Using more peds and training more, is not smart in a cutting phase: because you won’t gain muscle or increase performance or strength, and you lack resources to recover.

The stack I mention (unlike using more aas) both improve health and maximize fat loss at the same time: after long gaining phases my health tanks and I use the cutting phases as much for recovering health markers as for cutting down,

The lower you can go in kcals while still maintaining muscle, the faster you will rip the fat off. That goes for everyone.

Cutting down carbs will cut down kcals.

No one will loose muscle at all, if you stay on the AAS amount it takes to maintain your muscle mass to begin with (that is 0 ASS if you are below your natural limit), is on test, HGH, clean and metformin, gets enough protein and lifts heavy 2x a week, not even at a daily deficit at 3000 kcals,

Glp’s makes it easy to be in a massive low carb, low kcal deficit like that,
And the stack keeps you feeling good and helps you hold onto your muscle mass.

Its as simple as that,
Worked in hundreds of lads I’ve coached over the years, with no exceptions. So does cutting on more carbs, it just takes longer.
 
Last edited:
Anybody else ever tried the above?

I have used all compounds individually but I am considering using all 4 together and going on a hard cut to get as lean as possible.

Anybody here used all 4 on a cut? How was your experience?
too much stuff friend; more is not better, all this together only risks making you lose muscle in addition to fat, you will appear thin but without muscles, this is not bodybuilding, first review your diet, cardio and NEAT
 
Well now that two gigantic wall of texts from ChatGPT have been posted with zero original thought from the person who decided we needed to read that mess, I'm convinced!

If I wanted AI spam I'd go to chatgpt myself and ask the question.
 
here is some important keypoints i think it missed, theres probably way more:

how much muscle can you build with carbs vs no carbs

ChatGPT sagde:​

The difference in muscle-building potential between a high-carb vs no-carb (e.g. carnivore/keto) diet can be significant, especially over the long term and depending on training intensity, recovery, and enhancement status (natty vs on gear). Let’s break it down based on physiology and real-world outcomes:

Muscle Growth with Carbs vs No Carbs: Overview

FactorHigh-Carb DietNo-Carb Diet (Carnivore/Keto)
Glycogen storageOptimalDepleted
Training performanceHigher volume, intensity, recoveryOften lower energy output
Pump & muscle fullnessImprovedFlat look, reduced pump
mTOR & insulin signalingStrong activationWeaker (especially without carb-induced insulin spikes)
CortisolRegulated better post-trainingOften elevated
Net muscle gain (natural)OptimalSub-optimal (often 20–30% less)
Net muscle gain (on gear)HighStill decent, but not optimal

Realistic Muscle Gain Scenarios​


1. Natural Lifter, Bulking for 12 Weeks

  • High-Carb Diet: Gain ~4–6 lbs (1.8–2.7 kg) of lean mass
  • No-Carb Diet: Gain ~2.5–4 lbs (1.1–1.8 kg) of lean mass

2. Enhanced Lifter on Test + HGH + Tren, Bulking 12 Weeks

  • High-Carb Diet: Gain ~8–12 lbs (3.6–5.4 kg) of lean mass
  • No-Carb Diet: Gain ~6–9 lbs (2.7–4.1 kg) of lean mass


Why Carbs Matter for Muscle Growth

  1. Glycogen fuels training intensity.
    • Training harder = more muscle stimulus.
  2. Insulin is anabolic.
    • Carbs elevate insulin, which promotes muscle protein synthesis and inhibits muscle breakdown.
  3. Carbs regulate cortisol.
    • Low-carb diets often lead to elevated cortisol, which can hinder recovery and muscle growth.
  4. mTOR pathway stimulation.
    • While protein (especially leucine) activates mTOR, carbs amplify this by boosting insulin.

Why No-Carb Diets Limit Gains​

  • You may feel flat, under-recovered, and unable to hit high training volumes.
  • Glycogen is a limiting factor in heavy resistance training.
  • You often need higher fat to meet energy demands, which isn’t as efficient for muscle growth as carbs are.

✅ Summary​

  • Carbs help you train harder, recover faster, and grow more.
  • Without carbs, especially for natural lifters, you leave up to 30–40% of potential gains on the table.
  • Enhanced lifters can still grow without carbs — but not as much as they would with a smart carb strategy.

If you're cutting, low carbs might make sense short-term, but for muscle building, carbs are one of the most anabolic legal substances you can use (especially combined with AAS).
Let me know if you want a carb-cycling or low-carb bulk plan that tries to minimize downsides.

Du sagde:​

so just maingaining with carbs i can grow way more muscle than cutting them out? then arent i an idiot for ever doing that

ChatGPT sagde:​

You're not an idiot at all — in fact, the fact you're questioning and learning now puts you way ahead of most.

Short answer:​

Yes — even when maingaining (eating at or just above maintenance), having carbs in your diet will let you grow more muscle than going zero-carb. Especially if you’re:
  • training hard (which you are),
  • enhanced (which you are),
  • and prioritizing muscle growth with minimal fat gain.

Why you're not dumb for trying no-carb:​

  1. It’s a very common experiment.
    • Tons of lifters, even pros, fall into the carnivore/keto trend, especially when cutting — it’s marketed hard and sounds logical at first.
  2. You were probably trying to optimize fat loss.
    • Low-carb often leads to quicker water loss and visible fat loss, which can trick people into thinking it’s optimal.
  3. You likely still gained muscle if you were on gear.
    • AAS protects muscle hard, so your “loss” in gains might only be 10–20% lower — not a complete waste.

✅ What you should take away now:​

  • Carbs are muscle-fuel. Even 100–200g/day depending on your size and intake can dramatically improve training output.
  • You don’t need to “bulk dirty” — a controlled maingain with carbs can grow plenty of muscle without adding fat.
  • If you cycle carbs around training, you can stay lean and get the performance benefit.

Simple plan going forward:​

  • Keep carbs around training (pre/intra/post).
  • Use clean carbs like rice, oats, fruit, potatoes — they digest well and support recovery.
  • Stay at slight surplus or maintenance — let performance guide your intake.

Bottom line:​

You’re not dumb — you experimented, and now you know better. That’s called progress. Lots of pros went low-carb and realized later they sabotaged gains — but you caught it early.
Want help setting up a carb-focused maingain plan with your gear setup?

does protein stall at some point? lets say i eat only 240g protein with minimal carbs and a little fat, wouldn't i need carbs or does protein synthesis and triglycerides max out at some point and i would be better off adding carbs?

ChatGPT sagde:​

Great question — this gets into the limits of protein metabolism, and yes: protein does stall in its ability to build muscle without carbs, and here's why:

Key Truths About Protein, Carbs, and Muscle Growth

✅ 1. Muscle protein synthesis (MPS) is capped per meal and per day

  • Your body only uses a certain amount of amino acids for muscle-building at a time.
  • Around 0.4–0.6g/kg per meal maximizes MPS (so ~30–50g protein for most people).
  • After that, excess amino acids get oxidized for energy — not used for muscle growth.


⚠️ 2. Without carbs, more protein gets burned for fuel (gluconeogenesis)

  • Your body converts amino acids to glucose when carbs are low — especially if you're training hard.
  • That means less protein is used for recovery or muscle building.


⚠️ 3. Triglycerides (from fat) don't replace glycogen in training

  • Fat is a slow fuel. It's not effective for high-intensity anaerobic work like lifting or sprinting.
  • Carbs replenish glycogen and fuel explosive training, which is what stimulates growth.

✅ 4. Carbs amplify the muscle-building signal

  • Carbs spike insulin, which:
    • Reduces muscle protein breakdown
    • Increases nutrient delivery (like amino acids)
    • Activates mTOR synergistically with leucine
  • Without carbs, you’re getting a blunted anabolic response.

So what happens if you only eat 240g protein and low everything else?​

  • Your protein synthesis plateaus
  • Your training performance suffers (less stimulus = less growth)
  • You burn protein for energy instead of building muscle
  • You may feel flat, tired, and not recovering well

✅ You’d Be Better Off Adding Carbs​

Even 100–200g of carbs/day, especially around your workout, would:
  • Spare protein from being burned
  • Increase training volume and intensity
  • Enhance recovery
  • Help shuttle aminos into muscle

TL;DR​

ScenarioResult
240g protein + minimal carbs/fatMPS plateaus, protein wasted for energy, poor recovery
240g protein + moderate carbsMaximal muscle growth, performance, and recovery

Carbs don’t just “help” — they unlock the full potential of your protein and training. Without them, you're leaving growth on the table, even with a high-protein, enhanced setup.
Want me to help you figure out your ideal protein + carb balance for a lean mass phase?
Can we ban these retarded Chat GPT posts? Jesus.
 
Back
Top