Emerging Data About Combining GLP-1 Agonists with Myostatin Inhibitors

Type-IIx

Member

Emerging Data About Combining GLP-1 Agonists with Myostatin Inhibitors​

Benefits and Risks​

Type-IIx
Jul 31, 2025

Author​

Cormac J. Mannion (Type-IIx)

Date​

July 31, 2025


Thanks for reading Type-IIx’s Gear, Growth, and Gains Newsletter! This post is public so feel free to share it.
Share

Introduction​

GLP-1 agonists work. That's not debatable. Semaglutide (GLP-1) and tirzepatide – the incretin peptides – drop bodyweight fast, and the data supports their effectiveness for weight management. But here's the caveat: without lifting weights (resistance training), without adequate protein intake, or otherwise without some other intervention – which we'll discuss now – about 35% of that weight loss comes from lean muscle tissue, not fat. [1].

This is a problem! Despite evidence that semaglutide enhances insulin sensitivity to spare protein losses, the extreme caloric restriction that typifies severe energy restriction, such as when your appetite becomes so blunted by semaglutide that you're practically starving without noticing – or more importantly for an enhanced bodybuilder – without eating sufficient protein (and carbohydrate!) or training progressively and intensely (that only adequate carbohydrate makes possible), what inevitably happens is muscle loss. [2]. [3].

Despite the seemingly inapposite patient population for incretin peptides… the obese, the diabetic… who, quite unlike bodybuilders, are characterized by physical inactivity, to put it bluntly – there is evidence that even minor interventions like:

  • encouraging them to walk or get an hours' exercise a couple days per week, and
  • making sure they eat enough, maintaining scale weight reductions of no more than 1 lb weekly
Pays real dividends by maintaining muscle as visualized here by the navy arrow:


Figure 1 – Virtually no muscle loss with simple encouragement to exercise and only lose 1 lb weekly ("lifestyle intervention")… and yes, that is good ol' insulin building muscle (green arrow). [4].

Now think – if a couple thousand steps a week, maybe some light calisthenics, the occasional pink dumbbell being lifted – and remembering to eat lunch – can make such a difference, you can safely bet the farm that a serious bodybuilder can stave off these muscle losses when he's doing everything he needs to!

So we simply cannot be complacent.

These drugs, left unchecked, can and will hinder your efforts at improving your physique. The COURAGE trial data makes this crystal clear – patients on semaglutide alone (inactive and starving) lost 7.9 pounds of lean mass out of 23 total pounds lost. [1-1].

Myostatin inhibitors offer yet another solution – indeed, an opportunity. These compounds block the body's natural brake on muscle growth, and when you combine them with GLP-1 agonists, something interesting happens: The muscle-wasting effect of severe caloric restriction arising out of the GLP-1 effects is not only neutralized in sedentary patients… but real recomp occurs – the holy grail of increased muscle mass and decreased fat mass, simultaneously. [5].


Read More on Substack
 
This was a mind expanding read thank you for this information. Now I am going to explore myostatin inhibitors and yk-11 thanks to you
 
interesting read. Guess see what the future holds. Myostatin inhibitors though I am not sure are on black/grey markets. I don't know how well yk11 does this.
 
but real recomp occurs – the holy grail of increased muscle mass and decreased fat mass, simultaneously. [5].
im sure this cannot be healthy long term.

we would have to cycle on when testing it for 4-6 weeks add few kg of muscle mass and chill for 3-6months to see how our body has reacted to it, then rinse and repeat.

will be interesting to see how our joints, injury rate, cardiovascular health etc can be preserved while cheating on as much muscle mass as possible.

i am up for it if i could get my hands on it for a reasonable price.

tell-me-where.gif
 
im sure this cannot be healthy long term.

we would have to cycle on when testing it for 4-6 weeks add few kg of muscle mass and chill for 3-6months to see how our body has reacted to it, then rinse and repeat.

will be interesting to see how our joints, injury rate, cardiovascular health etc can be preserved while cheating on as much muscle mass as possible.

i am up for it if i could get my hands on it for a reasonable price.

View attachment 346758
Recomp ain’t even hard bro, CLIENT SUCCESSES: BEFORE & AFTER PICTURES

I would argue strongly that recomp is easier on your body than extreme weight cycling
 
100%.

now i was thinking about how they're using these drugs in pair with glp making people lose weight while losing absolute no muscle mass(obviously muscle mass is being build from the drugs faster than they lose from the deficit + more energy is coming from fat because the body dosent want to burn muscle now)

while they're not training.

muscle mass gained this way, just strictly talking about the freebies you get from the drugs will in its own way not have the biggest impact on your body.

but its more if your body can handle it? 5kg extra muscle in a deficit dosent sound way too good on the joints etc.

and ofc cardiovascular health is from the drugs aswell


but this may very well be a more myostatin long term health focused topic im definetly not talking about the recomp itself
 
Last edited:
Back
Top