Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

[Photon]

Well, you get the raw data, so you just keep an eye for the peak at that time with that sort of spectrum and there's no need for an input from me, I guess?

Would that work?

Works for me.
Thank you.

 

[AlexDavis43]

Works for me.
Thank you.

this part, too? (in bold)

Well, you get the raw data, so you just keep an eye for the peak at that time with that sort of spectrum and there's no need for an input from me, I guess?

Would that work?

 

[Photon]

this part, too? (in bold)

Technically you can ID it from the Spectra.

 

[Photon]

Hi @janoshik

We have the following raw purity % and gcms.
Per GCMS, it looks like there are test degradation products.
Is this treated as TNE in HPLC?
Is there a way to get the true purity of just TNE?

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

 

[janoshik]

Hi @janoshik

We have the following raw purity % and gcms.
Per GCMS, it looks like there are test degradation products.
Is this treated as TNE in HPLC?
Is there a way to get the true purity of just TNE?

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

View attachment 351950
View attachment 351949

Maybe it's thermal caused by GC? Maybe HPLC can't distinguish between 5 and 6?

QNMR to be sure, integrate every hydrogen, 500 bucks.

 

[Photon]

Maybe it's thermal caused by GC? Maybe HPLC can't distinguish between 5 and 6?

QNMR to be sure, integrate every hydrogen, 500 bucks.

I know that for certain oils, GCMS is required to get the mg/ml (e.g mtren).
If we request for raw purity % to be calculated via GCMS, is it possible and is the cost 170$?

 

[janoshik]

I know that for certain oils, GCMS is required to get the mg/ml (e.g mtren).
If we request for raw purity % to be calculated via GCMS, is it possible and is the cost 170$?

Mtren is thermally labile, thus it's near impossible to get proper quantities with GCMS. We use normal HPLC for mtren.

We don't use GCMS for purity measurements.

Cheers

 

[Jsilk757]

I want to give @janoshik a shoutout. I have sent them multiple different substances over the last year and they have been nothing but phenomenal. From the very first time, walking me through their ordering/mailing/result procedures. All the way to now, when I ask them specific in depth questions/concerns. They are always professional, courteous and ALWAYS respond in a timely fashion.

Jano, thanks for helping all of us with harm reduction efforts and keeping everyone on both sides of the game (Customers/Labs) a bit more honest

 

[dinfar1337]

@janoshik im just generally confused

Janoshik Analytical

this test says "nandrolone degradation products"

but its literally npp + andro skeleton and not estro skeleton we would have in nandrolone.

just want to make sure its not a naming error and the raw have testosterone in it.

the hplc came back as 89% npp

 

[janoshik]

@janoshik im just generally confused

Janoshik Analytical

this test says "nandrolone degradation products"

but its literally npp + andro skeleton and not estro skeleton we would have in nandrolone.

just want to make sure its not a naming error and the raw have testosterone in it.

the hplc came back as 89% npp

I'm not sure what you mean.

Took a good look at it - it's a steroid with phenylpropionate bound to it. Even auto id tries to fit testosterone phenylpropionate on it (but I'm 100% sure it is not) - so maybe that's what you're thinking too?



But I am 100% on it not being test p, due to different fragments that are quite important and complete lack of molecular ion, while the unknown has molar mass of NPP - 2 - which is typical to what we usually see in steroid degradation (mass - 2).

Also the auto-id confidence is real low, which is a pretty good indicator of it having to be taken with a grain of salt.

Also we'd see test pp in HPLC.

Hope this helps

Cheers

 

[janoshik]

I want to give @janoshik a shoutout. I have sent them multiple different substances over the last year and they have been nothing but phenomenal. From the very first time, walking me through their ordering/mailing/result procedures. All the way to now, when I ask them specific in depth questions/concerns. They are always professional, courteous and ALWAYS respond in a timely fashion.

Jano, thanks for helping all of us with harm reduction efforts and keeping everyone on both sides of the game (Customers/Labs) a bit more honest

Thank you! I posted this to our internal company forum and everyone really does appreciate that.

Everyone at the company tries their best and we adore that we can help people doing something we love!

Cheers

 

[janoshik]

PSA: Fake mounjaro KwikPen strongly suspect of containing insulin glargine.

 

[Sampei]

@janoshik I have been trying to mail your team since this morning with my usual email address that I have send hundreds of email to you (protonmail address) and I keep receiving undelivered because rejected by spam filter.

Is there any issue with your server? I need to place an order

 

[janoshik]

@janoshik I have been trying to mail your team since this morning with my usual email address that I have send hundreds of email to you (protonmail address) and I keep receiving undelivered because rejected by spam filter.

Is there any issue with your server? I need to place an order

Can you print screen and DM it to me please?

 

[Ryobi]

Jano age reveal on this one. Sir are you really only 31?


View: https://youtu.be/Vf__M0KLNzQ?si=t74EUpfz6QG5OviP

 

[dinfar1337]

I'm not sure what you mean.

Took a good look at it - it's a steroid with phenylpropionate bound to it. Even auto id tries to fit testosterone phenylpropionate on it (but I'm 100% sure it is not) - so maybe that's what you're thinking too?

View attachment 352290

But I am 100% on it not being test p, due to different fragments that are quite important and complete lack of molecular ion, while the unknown has molar mass of NPP - 2 - which is typical to what we usually see in steroid degradation (mass - 2).

Also the auto-id confidence is real low, which is a pretty good indicator of it having to be taken with a grain of salt.

Also we'd see test pp in HPLC.

Hope this helps

Cheers

hello mr janoshik.

is this also the same case? Janoshik Analytical

nandrolone degradation showing as test p

 

[janoshik]

hello mr janoshik.

is this also the same case? Janoshik Analytical

nandrolone degradation showing as test p

Yeah

Jano age reveal on this one. Sir are you really only 31?


View: https://youtu.be/Vf__M0KLNzQ?si=t74EUpfz6QG5OviP

Affirmative. Though I do feel quite a bit more aged.

 

[readalot]

nandrolone degradation

Would be good to clarify if this is artifact of heat in GC or raws came this way.

Should also always couple HPLC API% with any GCMS API%.

 

[dinfar1337]

Would be good to clarify if this is artifact of heat in GC or raws came this way.

Should also always couple HPLC API% with any GCMS API%.

i was happy enough with the result at 18% since im pretty sure the margin of error is 9-11% but i could be wrong

 

[k710]

Hey all, quick question.

If I have a compound im questioning and want to send it in for testing the AAS screening quatitative option will determine the compound and concentration in vial. My question is will this also detect if there is a liquid AI or something non-aas in the mixture?

This "primo" crashed my e2 fast af. Another member sent it same brand primo in May and your report came back saying 40mg of EQ. Im basically going through the steps to help fill in my "mystery oil" data points, but also to hopefully save someone from going through my current estrogen roller coaster trip.

Is there a better testing option for my scenario or how should I procreed to ensure theres no AI in the mixture?

Thanks in advance!