MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

My interest as a customer has gone to zero as well. I can test bottles myself, of course. But I can’t test the raws. Why not get a complete test while that sample is at Jano. Really not worth asking anymore. Onto sources that do a compete testing procedure. Best of luck
OEP and Arail for example. The amount of raws they’ve tested that have been bunk or low purity, etc. yet Primal just got excited and didn’t test their primo raws. Almost certain he’s just reselling china primo. Hope he proves me wrong with his sample sitting at Jano right now
 
GCMS on the primo sample sitting at Jano?
I am not trying to be a dick whatsoever but what I’m trying to understand is what you think GCMS is going to prove. GCMS profiles impurities and residual solvents, it doesn't identify country of origin lol and it doesn’t confirm or deny the “China Primo” conspiracy you’re leaning toward. So even if we run it, nothing changes on our side, and it still doesn’t give you the conclusion you’re hoping it will. The narrative keeps getting pushed, but the data won’t support it because GCMS simply isn’t designed to answer that question.

If you want it tested, we can have it added, but it’s important to be clear about what the result will and won’t show. It will not validate the implication you’re trying to make, and it doesn’t change anything on our end.
 
I am not trying to be a dick whatsoever but what I’m trying to understand is what you think GCMS is going to prove. GCMS profiles impurities and residual solvents, it doesn't identify country of origin lol and it doesn’t confirm or deny the “China Primo” conspiracy you’re leaning toward. So even if we run it, nothing changes on our side, and it still doesn’t give you the conclusion you’re hoping it will. The narrative keeps getting pushed, but the data won’t support it because GCMS simply isn’t designed to answer that question.

If you want it tested, we can have it added, but it’s important to be clear about what the result will and won’t show. It will not validate the implication you’re trying to make, and it doesn’t change anything on our end.
I mean if it contains the same junk MCT/OIL mix as the other China Primo than safe to say it's from China and not brewed by you... So I do think it will answer the question being asked.
 
OEP and Arail for example. The amount of raws they’ve tested that have been bunk or low purity, etc. yet Primal just got excited and didn’t test their primo raws. Almost certain he’s just reselling china primo. Hope he proves me wrong with his sample sitting at Jano right now
Hey atleast he re-vialed and capped em xD
At $75 Vial he is over doubling his money still. Good Business move.
 
I am not trying to be a dick whatsoever but what I’m trying to understand is what you think GCMS is going to prove. GCMS profiles impurities and residual solvents, it doesn't identify country of origin lol and it doesn’t confirm or deny the “China Primo” conspiracy you’re leaning toward. So even if we run it, nothing changes on our side, and it still doesn’t give you the conclusion you’re hoping it will. The narrative keeps getting pushed, but the data won’t support it because GCMS simply isn’t designed to answer that question.

If you want it tested, we can have it added, but it’s important to be clear about what the result will and won’t show. It will not validate the implication you’re trying to make, and it doesn’t change anything on our end.

You use pure MCT.
China oils don't.

It'll show up on GCMS.
 
I am not trying to be a dick whatsoever but what I’m trying to understand is what you think GCMS is going to prove. GCMS profiles impurities and residual solvents, it doesn't identify country of origin lol and it doesn’t confirm or deny the “China Primo” conspiracy you’re leaning toward. So even if we run it, nothing changes on our side, and it still doesn’t give you the conclusion you’re hoping it will. The narrative keeps getting pushed, but the data won’t support it because GCMS simply isn’t designed to answer that question.

If you want it tested, we can have it added, but it’s important to be clear about what the result will and won’t show. It will not validate the implication you’re trying to make, and it doesn’t change anything on our end.
No one’s being a dick, you’re just now following through with what you said in the past.

Run the test. Everyone knows how much added shit is in China oil. If you brewed it, I would imagine bare minimum will be detected.

For reference this was the GCMS ran on the China primo.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5193.webp
    IMG_5193.webp
    66.8 KB · Views: 141
I mean if it contains the same junk MCT/OIL mix as the other China Primo than safe to say it's from China and not brewed by you... So I do think it will answer the question being asked.

You use pure MCT.
China oils don't.

It'll show up on GCMS.
If its the same oil other vendors are selling, then isn't the 0.69% methenolone base a bit of a tell.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-11-21 092211.webp
    Screenshot 2025-11-21 092211.webp
    68.9 KB · Views: 137
before someone’s tests it to find out, can we get a hard answer on whether it’s repackaged/filtered cn oil or brewed yourself with different raws?
I think it’s a valid question considering all of the circumstances.

They paid for raws, waited then brewed it.
How can it be any clearer?


If its the same oil other vendors are selling, then isn't the 0.69% methenolone base a bit of a tell.

I'm sure there's variances between testing.
 
before someone’s tests it to find out, can we get a hard answer on whether it’s repackaged/filtered cn oil or brewed yourself with different raws?
I think it’s a valid question considering all of the circumstances.
@Primal_Pharma should be the one to run the GCMS. After all, Jano has a vial in hand right now. If they decide to run the test, will show if they’re full of shit or not with their previous comments
 
They paid for raws, waited then brewed it.
How can it be any clearer?

Sorry I must have missed the direct answer somewhere. I thought the speculation was that that was assumed but could just be repackaged based on similar results elsewhere and the timing.
I haven’t kept up on every post in a while.
This is why I don’t chime in. Lol
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top