Appreciate the detailed breakdown and your time responding. I get that it’s technically within spec, and yeah 93% is a passing result by most underground standards. That said, I think it’s fair for customers to feel a little let down when a 250 label lands in the low 230s, especially when we’re putting real trust (and cash) into this process.
I still respect the consistency and transparency you’re showing just being real about how it feels from the user side when expectations meet lab numbers. Would I buy Pharmacom again? Yeah, I would. That said, there are other sources on this site advertising 200/250mg and their lab results are coming back spot on or even slightly overdosed. I’m not here to argue your point; Pharmacom is a well-established name with a strong reputation and plenty of users seeing real results. I appreciate the professional response and transparency.
I understand, and appreciate you sharing your results and thoughts -- that is what this community is all about. I would hit "like" on your post, but my account type does not have that option/functionality so I will reply instead.
My following thoughts are not shared as a debate or to disagree with you in anyway (after all, there is nothing to debate or even disagree with).
I respect and understand your feelings. I'm just taking the time to share additional thoughts about some things to consider so hopefully you may feel a little better and know that I care (I use these products too).
And, as you mentioned, this source has been transparent. Some other source may only share the best results. But, if you look back, I have shared some results that have fallen short of the +/- 10%. Also, in the past there have been some batches that failed to meet our desired standards and were sold a significant discount (I think 50% off if my memory is correct) because the source found out that they missed the mark.
I share all the results that I have, not just the best results.
I hope this level of integrity and honesty will mean something to people and be respected.
With that said, please consider the following thoughts:
1) As you can see from our recent results, and the other two that I shared (two of the same exact batch, sent at the same time, tested on the same day, to explore how close are multiple results on the same exact thing -- to test the testing process itself), there can be a small variance in testing results.
This means it may be possible that your vial actually contains a little more, or, to be fair, a little less. If we tested multiple samples of it, and then took an average, we should start to converge on the more exact concentration by averaging out the potential variance.
Nonetheless, we have many results over time showing it is the correct compound and the correct concentration within +/- 10% of label.
+/- 10% (over or under) is a very well-established acceptable standard, accounts for potential variance from the testing process, and is standard this what this source claims they provides.
2) While we would all prefer an absolute perfect and exact dosage as the label claim, that is not possible for anyone, and even if it was achieved, each replication of testing results may have a slight error higher or lower so we may not even be able to perfectly observer such a product.
3) As humans living in the real world, there will be a slight deviation, either over or under, label claim in every batch. I feel that it is better to come in slightly lower than label for safety reasons -- this way there is no chance someone takes too much of something without knowing it; slightly less will not acutely harm someone, but taking too much can cause some individuals serious problems (men sensitive to estrogen conversion, females, etc.).
Again, to be fair, there are batches that will come in slightly over label.
4) There are other factors that contribute to quality and safety other than just the concentration. For example, I recently shared results for heavy metal contamination. Sterility, quality of carrier, overall formulation, etc. All play a part and Pharmacom Labs has one of the best possible overall products.
5) The recent results I shared, combined with the results you just shared, gives us all an even more powerful look at this specific product.
Both results came back good, and, as such, it shows customers can be confident that this source consistently provides the real thing.
Thanks again
@Alias Chosen for the respectful conversation and sharing your testing results.
