Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

Wdym? Pretty sure the uk knife attacks on women was the “inspiration”.
View attachment 322388
And do you believe the character that was created to represent the (unfortunately) many perpetrators is an accurate portrayal of reality? I guess what I’m getting at is are you sure, I mean really sure, that you’re not being subtly manipulated by the exact kind of creative narratives that are used on all those red pill nitwits? How much distance do you think there is between you and them, in terms of how susceptible you are to a bit of good storytelling when it confirms your priors?
 
And do you believe the character that was created to represent the (unfortunately) many perpetrators is an accurate portrayal of reality? I guess what I’m getting at is are you sure, I mean really sure, that you’re not being subtly manipulated by the exact kind of creative narratives that are used on all those red pill nitwits? How much distance do you think there is between you and them, in terms of how susceptible you are to a bit of good storytelling when it confirms your priors?
Yah I’m being manipulated into thinking that dehumanizing and killing women is bad.
 
Nah that’s also true, similar issues with different origins
You're right. People been stabbing people in the uk forever. If guns were as abundant there as they are in America, it'd be a gun problem.

But if you're gonna make a show specifically to bring attention to the recent uprise in violent crime to women in the UK, make it accurate. Otherwise what are you bringing attention to?

This isn't Disney acquiesing to China by refusing to mention Tibet and turning a Buddhist monk character into a white woman. Or the makers of Hamilton trying to be cute and turning the America's founding fathers into "bipoc".

You wanna bring attention to a very serious problem, well you should be serious about it, and accurate. But it opens up a bunch of political cans of worms about the direction that country is heading in. God forbid if they did that.
 
You're right. People been stabbing people in the uk forever. If guns were as abundant there as they are in America, it'd be a gun problem.

But if you're gonna make a show specifically to bring attention to the recent uprise in violent crime to women in the UK, make it accurate. Otherwise what are you bringing attention to?

This isn't Disney acquiesing to China by refusing to mention Tibet and turning a Buddhist monk character into a white woman. Or the makers of Hamilton trying to be cute and turning the America's founding fathers into "bipoc".

You wanna bring attention to a very serious problem, well you should be serious about it, and accurate. But it opens up a bunch of political cans of worms about the direction that country is heading in. God forbid if they did that.
There’s multiple issues, you don’t have to mention every single related issue when bringing up one of them. Problems are best solved one at a time and another related problem existing doesn’t mean another doesn’t deserve attention. It is derailing though to respond to any issue with “what about this related issue?” They have entirely different origins and can’t be solved at the same time and we weren’t talking about that issue anyways.
 
There’s multiple issues, you don’t have to mention every single related issue when bringing up one of them. Problems are best solved one at a time and another related problem existing doesn’t mean another doesn’t deserve attention. It is derailing though to respond to any issue with “what about this related issue?” They have entirely different origins and can’t be solved at the same time and we weren’t talking about that issue anyways.
To suggest that the recent rise in violent crime to women in that area is a result of Andrew tate telling young men to lift weights and be confident and that women aren't infallible as feminism would lead the world to believe is disingenuous.

But frankly I skipped a bunch of pages and went straight to the most recent. And if I'm misunderstanding what you and @Iron_Yuppie were talking about, well my bad.
 
Ok... but everyone* who is a DEI hire is worse at their job than the merit based hires. So you can look at the lot of bad employees at work, eliminate the white males, and there's your group of potential DEI hires.

*I'm sure there are less than a handful of situations where a company is in a situation where they must hire someone of a specific race to reach the DEI quota, and in comes such a potential hire who is also absolutely outstanding. So now when they fall under the DEI employees "category," it is only nominal, because the company has to present them that way, despite actually hiring them on a merit. Outside of this rare circumstance, the DEI hires are going to be unqualified. (Other merit based hires whom a company identifies as "DEI" hires also don't count as true DEI hires. The company wanted to hire them, which flies in the face of the need for DEI).
Chris Christie, of all people, did an interview somewhat recently where he spoke about his experience in NJ. He said increasing DEI actually helped them hire employees more skilled than they were getting from their usual talent pools.

Of course since he's republican, and DEI is the outrage topic of the month for them, he had to say that in a very roundabout way because most politicians are cowards when it comes to uncomfortable truths.

BTW, quota systems are stupid IMO...and probably not legal per the Civil Rights act.
 
Chris Christie, of all people, did an interview somewhat recently where he spoke about his experience in NJ. He said increasing DEI actually helped them hire employees more skilled than they were getting from their usual talent pools.

Of course since he's republican, and DEI is the outrage topic of the month for them, he had to say that in a very roundabout way because most politicians are cowards when it comes to uncomfortable truths.

BTW, quota systems are stupid IMO...and probably not legal per the Civil Rights act.
IMG_1094.webp
 
Chris Christie, of all people, did an interview somewhat recently where he spoke about his experience in NJ. He said increasing DEI actually helped them hire employees more skilled than they were getting from their usual talent pools.

Of course since he's republican, and DEI is the outrage topic of the month for them, he had to say that in a very roundabout way because most politicians are cowards when it comes to uncomfortable truths.

BTW, quota systems are stupid IMO...and probably not legal per the Civil Rights act.
I mean you said it yourself. I could care less what Chris Christie said. He was also the governor of NJ. I think the implications of him being the R governor of a deep blue state are obvious.
 
Back
Top