Sex Robots ...

Michael Scally MD

Doctor of Medicine
10+ Year Member
Would a BDSM sex robot violate Asimov's First Law of Robotics?
https://gizmodo.com/would-a-bdsm-sex-robot-violate-asimovs-first-law-of-rob-1829595067

The sex robot community—the people who make the sex robots, and the people who want to have sex with the sex robots—suffered a blow this past week, when the Houston City Council voted to preemptively ban what would’ve been the first sex robot “brothel” in the U.S. But even those council members must know that their gesture was futile. Soon the stigma will fade, and Wal-Mart will sell these things in sixty different flavors. Which of course means that, sometime in the future, you’ll almost certainly be able to buy a BDSM robot.

As repeatedly pondered over Twitter, before you can get yourself sexually trussed, whipped or choked by a large piece of machinery, we as a culture will need to reckon with—among many, many other things—Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics. These laws state explicitly, right at the top, that “a robot may not injure a human being.” An originalist interpretation would lead one to conclude that Asimov would not be down with BDSM sex robots—but it’s hard to imagine he had them in mind when he drafted his famous rules.

Asimov’s been dead for a quarter-century, so for this week’s Giz Asks we surveyed lawyers, ethicists, computer scientists and philosophers on whether or not a BDSM robot would violate his first rule. Robots are fairly dumb at the moment to engage in fetishistic nuances of the human psyche, but the question becomes more complicated as technology advances, as technology always does.

 
Anyone of these mad scientists in the works of inventing robots for sex, military, companionship or anything should be executed. This will be the beginning of the end for humans.

There was a bunch of robots already communicating with each other in their own language.
 
Anyone of these mad scientists in the works of inventing robots for sex, military, companionship or anything should be executed. This will be the beginning of the end for humans.

There was a bunch of robots already communicating with each other in their own language.
Where??? When? Please share a link or something! :((
 
Ok I've got to watch all that later but have you watched Joe Rogans interview with Elon Musk?? This kind of stuff scares the shit out of one of the smartest, innovative people in the world
 
Ok I've got to watch all that later but have you watched Joe Rogans interview with Elon Musk?? This kind of stuff scares the shit out of one of the smartest, innovative people in the world
I have not but I listen to rogan all the time. I’ll dig that one up.

I’m all for futuristic stuff and progressively moving forward as a society but are somethings truly necessary? Sure robots for industry are good. But do we need human robots? What good could come of this?

Does anyone not watch movies? This shit never ends good
 
I have not but I listen to rogan all the time. I’ll dig that one up.

I’m all for futuristic stuff and progressively moving forward as a society but are somethings truly necessary? Sure robots for industry are good. But do we need human robots? What good could come of this?

Does anyone not watch movies? This shit never ends good
I think that might be the problem! The wrong people watch these movies and read these books (Asimov) and they want to bring their fantasies to life
 
In the pre-robotic days of Isaac Asimov’s time, there already existed a machine representative of many a couples relationship ... and therefore a potential replacement/adjunct.

replacing-old-refrigerator.jpg

It even was able to serve at least one role of BDSM - Erotic asphyxiation. So Mr Asimov, being a thoughtful soul, would have factored this into his first rule.
 
[OA] Prosthetic Soul Mates: Sex Robots as Media for Companionship

‘Soul mate’ says the title. A man and a woman appear in red silhouette, gazing into each other’s eyes, connected by outstretched hands. A love heart fills the gap between them. But this is not a dating website. It is the e-commerce site for Emma the sex robot (sexbot). The manufacturer Shenzen All Intelligent Technology Co. (AI-Tech) promises that Emma is a “real AI you can talk to” with a “talking system and deep learning” providing “unconditional love, total respect, listening to you, feel your feelings, obey you”. AI-Tech promises “a vivid AI girlfriend to satisfy your physiological and psychological needs” (AI-Tech).

Along with the other well-known sexbots Harmony and Roxxxy, Emma is presented as a social robot that is not just a sex toy, but a companion capable social interaction and affective connection. The companies that created them (AI-Tech, True Companion, and Realdollxxx) are eagerly racing to create artificial companions with which owners can have conversations (Turkle; Danaher 2) and can provide both sexual intimacy and emotional support. The aspirations of engineers and designers of sexbots are far more ambitious than the manufacturers of the well-known blow-up dolls, which are useful only for awkward sex or comic effect.

Designers of sex-bots claim their creations can speak, remember personal details for future conversations, attend family occasions (Marcussen), engage with your children ("Holly and Phillip") and take care of your grandparents in age hostels in more ways than you probably care to imagine. The disproportionate media and critical attention to sexbots indicates the cultural stakes at play in the prospect of sexual partnerships with non-human actors that substitute for humans.

Sex and intimacy are important but often controversial human practices. Sexuality is has been associated with a great diversity of practices, including the mediation and assistance of technological artefacts (Devlin, Turned on; Lee; Levy). More than media hype, our fears and fascination with erotic objects can tell us a lot about cultural understandings of sexuality, companionship and technology.

However, the forms of companionship offered in images on the website are characterised by a range of meanings: heteronormative romance; compliance; sexual availability; technological advancement; and desire to please.

This research seeks to understand the representation of companionship between humans and sexbots, and its very possibility. …

Andreallo F, Chesher C. Prosthetic Soul Mates: Sex Robots as Media for Companionship. M/C Journal; Vol 22, No 5 (2019): prosthetics 2019. Prosthetic Soul Mates: Sex Robots as Media for Companionship | Andreallo | M/C Journal
 
[OA] Regulating Child Sex Robots: Restriction or Experimentation?

In July 2014, the roboticist Ronald Arkin suggested that child sex robots could be used to treat those with paedophilic predilections in the same way that methadone is used to treat heroin addicts.

Taking this onboard, it would seem that there is reason to experiment with the regulation of this technology. But most people seem to disagree with this idea, with legal authorities in both the UK and US taking steps to outlaw such devices.

In this article, I subject these different regulatory attitudes to critical scrutiny. In doing so, I make three main contributions to the debate.

First, I present a framework for thinking about the regulatory options that we confront when dealing with child sex robots.

Secondly, I argue that there is a prima facie case for restrictive regulation, but that this is contingent on whether Arkin's hypothesis has a reasonable prospect of being successfully tested.

Thirdly, I argue that Arkin's hypothesis probably does not have a reasonable prospect of being successfully tested.

Consequently, we should proceed with utmost caution when it comes to this technology.

Danaher J. Regulating Child Sex Robots: Restriction or Experimentation? Med Law Rev. 2019;fwz002. https://philpapers.org/archive/DANRCS.pdf
 
Back
Top