Clinton In Deep Shit.

[XKawN]

Turns out they have found new emails. Very damming emails. Secret government information that was sent to a non government person. These 300 emails, it has been confirmed, we're hacked by China, Russia and Israel. When asked if he'll reopen the email case, Jeff sessions said that he would recuse himself because as a senator he was very critical of her. This means he will leave it up to the FBI workers who have been very critical over not charging Clinton for her criminal activity. Looks as if these are the most damming emails to date and looks as if they will go after her. Can't believe there are people's that wanted this felon to be president. Obama has 7 days left to Pardon her. As I'm sure he will.

 

[Burrr]

I heard there is video of her pissing on Trump

 

[Genghis K.]

Keep your trash in America and out of Australia. Clowns everywhere in American politics.

 

[ronin17]

Turns out they have found new emails. Very damming emails. Secret government information that was sent to a non government person. These 300 emails, it has been confirmed, we're hacked by China, Russia and Israel. When asked if he'll reopen the email case, Jeff sessions said that he would recuse himself because as a senator he was very critical of her. This means he will leave it up to the FBI workers who have been very critical over not charging Clinton for her criminal activity. Looks as if these are the most damming emails to date and looks as if they will go after her. Can't believe there are people's that wanted this felon to be president. Obama has 7 days left to Pardon her. As I'm sure he will.

Uh-huh. Sure. Sounds totally believable.

 

[XKawN]

Uh-huh. Sure. Sounds totally believable.

so you don't believe in what the FBI has said they've found all along or you just don't believe this document dump in particular?

 

[XKawN]

Part of an article from judge Napolitano . The rest of the article I left out due to redundancy.


Sunday evening, during the NFL playoff game between the New York Giants and the Green Bay Packers, the FBI posted on its website more than 300 emails that Clinton had sent to an unnamed colleague not in the government -- no doubt her adviser Sid Blumenthal -- that had fallen into the hands of foreign powers. It turns out -- and the Sunday night release proves this -- that Blumenthal was hacked by intelligence agents from at least three foreign governments and that they obtained the emails Clinton had sent to him that contained state secrets. Sources believe that the hostile hackers were the Russians and the Chinese and the friendly hackers were the Israelis.

Last Sunday’s revelations make the case against Clinton far more serious than Comey presented it to be last summer. Indeed, Sen. Jeff Sessions, who has been nominated by Trump to be attorney general and who has been a harsh critic of Clinton's, told the Senate Judiciary Committee this week that he would step aside from any further investigation of Clinton, thereby acknowledging that the investigation will probably be opened again.

One of the metrics that the DOJ examines in deciding whether to prosecute is an analysis of harm caused by the potential defendant. I have examined the newly released emails, and the state secrets have been whited out. Yet it is clear from the FBI analysis of them that real secrets were exposed by the nation’s chief diplomat -- meaning she violated an agreement she signed right after she took office, in which she essentially promised that she would not do what she eventually did.

The essence of the American justice system is the rule of law. The rule of law means that no one is beneath the law’s protections or above its obligations.

Should Clinton skate free so the Trump administration can turn the page? Should the new DOJ be compassionate toward Clinton because of her humiliating election loss and likely retirement from public life? Of course not. She should be prosecuted as would anyone else who let loose secrets to our enemies and then lied about it.

 

[ronin17]

so you don't believe in what the FBI has said they've found all along or you just don't believe this document dump in particular?

No, I don't believe there is anything damaging in those emails or she would be in deep shit. How many times does it need to be investigated?

It reminds me of bengazi. All smoke no fire.

 

[ronin17]

I love it when people suggest she is somehow protected. She would be crucified just like her husband was if there were any serious laws she had broken regarding those emails. All fantasy.

 

[Northern Nutrition]

I have no dog in this fight but simply wanted to clarify that a person cannot receive a pardon without a conviction.

 

[GigaloRob]

I have no dog in this fight but simply wanted to clarify that a person cannot receive a pardon without a conviction.

That's incorrect.

 

[Eman]

I have no dog in this fight but simply wanted to clarify that a person cannot receive a pardon without a conviction.

In 1866, the Supreme Court ruled in http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=71&invol=333 that the pardon power "extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment."

 

[Northern Nutrition]

That's incorrect.

Edit: I was typing when you posted.

 

[GigaloRob]

Explain.

@Eman beat me to it.

 

[Northern Nutrition]

How does one define a commission if no charges are laid?

 

[GigaloRob]

How does one define a commission if no charges are laid?

The most famous preemptive pardon in American history was of Richard Nixon. President Ford absolved his predecessor of all crimes he “has committed or may have committed or taken part in” between inauguration day 1969 and resignation day 1974.

 

[Northern Nutrition]

Richard Nixon was charged and impeached.

 

[Eman]

How does one define a commission if no charges are laid?

It sounds kind of crazy, but it really isn't at the same time. Most pardons don't work the way Nixon's did... And most Presidents wouldn't pardon like Ford did.

Richard Nixon was charged and impeached.

You need to brush up on your American History...

 

[Northern Nutrition]

My point was that Nixon was charged by the HOR in 74' and resigned before impeachment. BUT, he was in fact facing charges and impeachment.

 

[Xlgx]

It reminds me of bengazi. All smoke no fire.

Please elaborate ...

 

[GigaloRob]

My point was that Nixon was charged by the HOR in 74' and resigned before impeachment. BUT, he was in fact facing charges and impeachment.

Actually you keep moving the goal post in your argument. First you proclaimed that a person can't be pardoned without a conviction. That is false. Now you are saying Nixon was facing charges and impeachment. So again, while unusual and probably will never happen again, a person can be pardoned for acts they have already committed. That means regardless of prosecution, charges, or conviction. A pardon can't be done for any crime that may take place in the future.